Re: [sipxtapi-dev] Scm versus sipxecs repository
Thanks a lot, that definitely clears things up.
Arjun
-----Original Message-----
From: alexander.chemeris@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:alexander.chemeris@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alexander Chemeris
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 5:12 PM
To: Nair, Arjun (CAR:9D30)
Cc: sipxtapi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [sipxtapi-dev] Scm versus sipxecs repository
Hi,
On 4/3/08, Arjun Nair <anair1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What is the difference between the - sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/rep/ - and
> - scm.sipfoundry.org/rep/ -? I noticed that the repository at sipxecs
> does not have a sipXtapi branch and the sipXcallLib/sipXtackLib are
> different from the repository at scm.sipfoundry. Is one newer than the
other?
sipxecs.sipfoundry.org repository contains code for sipXecs project -
SIP server with dual license (Pingtel-proprietary and LGPL). Pingtel
does not maintain sipXtapi project, because it is UA-side, not
server-side.
scm.sipfoundry.org repository is clean LPGL code, it contains old code
of Pingtel SIP-server (supressed by sipXecs now) and up-to-date code for
sipXtapi. We're aiming to keep sipXtapi as real open-source solution
without double licensing, so we're working with old 'scm'
repository.
Hope this clarify things a bit.
--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
SIPez LLC.
SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting
http://www.SIPez.com
tel: +1 (617) 273-4000
