Re: [sipxtapi-dev] Scm versus sipxecs repository
Hi,
On 4/3/08, Arjun Nair <anair1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What is the difference between the - sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/rep/ - and -
> scm.sipfoundry.org/rep/ -? I noticed that the repository at sipxecs does not
> have a sipXtapi branch and the sipXcallLib/sipXtackLib are different from
> the repository at scm.sipfoundry. Is one newer than the other?
sipxecs.sipfoundry.org repository contains code for sipXecs project -
SIP server with dual license (Pingtel-proprietary and LGPL). Pingtel
does not maintain sipXtapi project, because it is UA-side, not server-side.
scm.sipfoundry.org repository is clean LPGL code, it contains old
code of Pingtel SIP-server (supressed by sipXecs now) and up-to-date
code for sipXtapi. We're aiming to keep sipXtapi as real open-source
solution without double licensing, so we're working with old 'scm'
repository.
Hope this clarify things a bit.
--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
SIPez LLC.
SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting
http://www.SIPez.com
tel: +1 (617) 273-4000
