Re: [Ietf-behave] Conflicting ICMP payload translation reqs:MUSTvs. SHOULD
Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> Given that the UDP draft is in the RFC Editor Queue, and the
> ICMP and TCP documents are not even assigned to a shepherding
> AD in the tracker yet, your best path forward really may be
> to issue UDP, UPDATE it with ICMP, and refer to ICMP for
> the ICMP requirements supporting TCP... assuming that the TCP
> draft doesn't pass the ICMP draft in the chute.
Yes, I agree that's what we should do. ICMP's text can
clearly indicate this one UDP requirement that it's updating
from Should to Must.
-d
