Re: [Ietf-behave] p2p-state as new milestone?

["Kaushik Biswas \(kbiswas\)" <kbiswas@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am fine with adapting this as a WG document and would be willing to
review the same as it progress.

Thanks,
Kaushik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-behave-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:ietf-behave-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Pyda Srisuresh
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:25 AM
> To: Dan Wing (dwing); ietf-behave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Ietf-behave] p2p-state as new milestone?
> 
> Dan,
> 
> Let me clarify on the applicability of the p2p-state draft to 
> the WG. The document provides the current state of NAT 
> traversal techniques in use by P2P applications. As such, 
> this provides a background for the recommendations in 
> draft-ford-behave-app-04.txt, which is currently a candidate 
> for the "protocol design techniques for using the existing 
> set of NAT traversal approaches"
> milestone. For this reason, I requested for the p2p-state 
> draft to be advanced as informational RFC.
> 
> My read of the charer for this WG is that it is focussed on 
> requirements and BCP documents. So, initialy (a few months 
> ago), I requested Magnus to review this as independent 
> submission, to which he readily agreed. The doucment was sent 
> for review on both behve and p2psip lists. The current rev of 
> the draft folds in all the comments received during that 
> review. Later, Magnus clarified that he believed that the 
> draft indeed is within the WG charter and as such should be 
> progressed as WG document. Hence my request to consider this 
> as WG draft. I understand, you are aware of the events 
> preceding the request. But, I am sending this note for the 
> benefit of the WG at large.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> regards,
> suresh
> 
> --- Dan Wing <dwing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The authors of draft-srisuresh-behave-p2p-state have asked 
> us to adopt 
> > the document to become a working group document.  We don't 
> currently 
> > have a milestone for such a work item, so a new milestone 
> (and date) 
> > would need to be created.
> > 
> > To adopt the document I would like some discussion on the 
> list around 
> > this document's applicability to the WG.  We will also need 
> at least 
> > two WG volunteers for ongoing technical review as the 
> document progresses.
> > 
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-srisuresh-behave-p2p-state-0
> > 4.txt
> > 
> > -d
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf-behave mailing list
> > Ietf-behave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-behave
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-behave mailing list
> Ietf-behave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-behave
>