Re: [Ietf-behave] STUN Server Discovery
Hello,
On 04 October 2006, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>> I disagree with this one. There are definitely implementations out
>> there,
>Can you point me at a deployed one - I've been looking for
>some flows I can capture to show as an example.
uhm, that's more difficult to answer. ;) There are definitely
implementations.
One is for example part of the the Sofia-SIP open-source SIP stack. And
there
have been other implementations at testing events. But I do not know of
any widescale deployments (anyone else on the list?)....
Still, the problem remains. As there are clients implemented according
to
RFC3489 - including the shared-secret discovery part, upgrades to
the servers should not break these clients. Specifically, these clients
will make SRV queries for "_stun._tcp", and it would be harmful to reuse
this service name for something else in the bis draft.
--
first.surname@xxxxxxxxx (Kai Vehmanen)
Networking Technologies Laboratory, Nokia Research Center
